A California coalition of small business owners-calling itself Small Business for Affordable Healthcare-has announced support for the concept of mandated employer funding for health care coverage.

The group released a survey yesterday that claims over half of California small business owners would favor paying to a statewide purchasing pool to acquire affordable health coverage for their employees.

The conventional wisdom has been that small employers are a monolith that opposes any attempt to require employers to provide health care coverage. Several California employer groups have been very active in lobbying for workers' comp reform and against health care reform that contains mandated costs for employees. The California Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business come to mind.

There are, of course, several health care reform proposals alive in the legislature (Schwarzenegger's plan, the Perata-Nunez plan which is AB 8, and the Sheila Kuehl "single payer" plan). Schawarzenegger's plan would require employers to pay 4% of payroll into a state fund. AB 8 would require employers to pay 7.5% of payroll.

The Small Business for Affordable Health Care coalition joins a coalition of several large employers-Safeway and Pacific Gas & Electric among them-in pushing for reform this year.

You can read the small business coalition's report by clicking here:

http://www.smallbusinessforhealthcare.org/

Julius Young
www.boxerlaw.com
*

The California Division of Workers Compensation is proposing to adopt guidelines for treatment of chronic pain. The guidelines are largely based on the "Official Disability Guidelines," known as the ODG guidelines.

By clicking the following link you can read the proposed treatment guidelines and participate in an online forum to comment on the proposed guidelines:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/DWCWCABForum/ ... ;RegID=212

The online public forum on the guidelines closes on September 4. So far, comment from many doctors specializing in chronic pain treatment is positive. Check out the comments from many of California's leading pain management specialists. But you do not have to be a doctor to add your comments to the public forum.

In choosing the ODG guidelines, the DWC has for the first time rejected ACOEM as a basis for official treatment standards. Clearly ACOEM has been an inadequate standard for dealing with chronic pain.

But remember that this is the comment phase. The final version could be different, particularly if major system stakeholders object to this version.

Stay tuned.

Julius Young
http://www.boxerlaw.com/attorneys.html
*

I was always a big sucker for baseball and football cards. One of the worst things my mother ever did was to throw out my collection while I was off at college. Little did she know they'd eventually be worth a small fortune.

Someday on eBay perhaps you'll be able to find Poizner cards.

Poizner cards? What?#! Cards of California's Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner? The high tech millionaire who may be the great Republican hope to succeed Schwarzenegger as governor in 2010?

Yep. Poizner cards have surfaced. Four of them, dropped off in California Republican legislators' Capitol offices early this week.

The Sacramento Bee notes that one features Poizner's face in a Che Guevara style uniform and beret, along with a hammer and sickle. Another card trumpeted "Reject the conservative Republican agenda" and "support socialized insurance."

Other cards said "Make millions, then become a man of the people" and "believe that BIG GOVERNMENT is your friend."

A performance art project? Dirty tricks project of potential political opponents? Off the wall effort by some lone conservative political junkie worried that Poizner will drift toward the middle so eschewed by the
California Flash Report crowd? Sympathizer's ploy to stir up publicity in contrast to the Senate GOP minority holding up the state budget? Whatever the answer, it makes for a fun parlor game.

To learn more about Poizner's stance on workers' comp so far, you can click here:

http://www.workerscompzone.com/index.ph ... 4f787d6811

Stay tuned.

Julius Young
www.boxerlaw.com
*

What took seven weeks and made California's governor look like a hostage to the far right of his party? The California budget, of course.

But the two have finally tango-ed.

This afternoon Senate Minority leader Dick Ackerman essentially caved, joining Senator Abel Maldonado of Santa Maria in voting for the budget which in large measure is similar to that proposed by the titular head of their own party (there are some significant changes that were extracted by the GOP Senate minority, however, and you can see a summary by clicking here:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... =printable

The gloating among the shrink-government-until-we-can drown-it-in-a-bathtub folks at the California Flash Report is probably coming to a close. But it remains to be seen whether Schwarzenegger will veer back closer to members of his own party or turn away from them. And will there be residual anger in the Capitol or a new gloss of "post-partisanship" on legislative business in River City? Go figure.

The feedback from unhappy state contractors with stalled projects and from nursing home and medical facilities operators who had to borrow money to meet payroll may have been a factor in bringing this charade to a close.

And now it's on to substantive business. Health care reform. Term limits reform. Water storage project issues.

And workers' comp bills. Until the legislative session ends in mid-September I'll be resuming more commentary on those bills, many of which were parked during the budget debate.

Still, it's unlikely that the Governor will buck the Chamber of Commerce business interests he has tied himself to during his tenure.

Stay tuned.

Julius Young
www.boxerlaw.com
*

Employee workers' comp fraud is sexy. The high drama of catching a worker on video water skiing when they claim to need a cane to walk. Using night vision photography to catch a worker moving tools out of his truck.

Every so often the 10 o'clock news will show a worker being led to jail in handcuffs.

But is that really the big kahuna problem in California comp? No.

A major study by UC Berkeley researchers Frank Neuhauser and Colleen Donovan unveiled in August 2007 shows the massive problem of employer fraud. The study, entitled "Fraud in Workers' Compensation Payroll Reporting: How Much Employer Fraud Exists? What Is the Impact on Honest Employers?", was prepared for "Cheese Whiz", the California Commission on Health, Safety and Workers' Compensation (CHSWC).

California workers' comp premiums are based on payroll. Neuhauser's study shows that California employers may be under-reporting payroll by as much as 23%. The amount of under-reported payroll may be billions of dollars.

Why does this matter? Honest employers are faced with paying premiums that are high as a result of fraudulent reporting by dishonest employers. Comp rates for high risk occupations are particularly affected by this type of fraud.The problem seems especially acute in some industries such as construction and among "PEOS" (professional employee organizations, entities which basically lease out employees to other entities).

Interestingly, the study also notes concerns about systematic under-reporting of premium by "one national insurer" (that would be AIG, the American International Group) that has surfaced in other states. Neuhauser's report recommends that the California Department of Insurance and CHWSC make this a high priority for study. You can expect that we'll be learning much more about AIG over the coming year, and it won't be pretty.

You can see my earlier post on employer fraud "It's the Employer Fraud, Stupid-Part 1" by clicking here:
http://www.workerscompzone.com/index.ph ... 670342ae49

Stay tuned. In upcoming posts I'll be looking at some issues surrounding the current two year limit on temporary disability and the possible legislative fix.

In the meanwhile, you can subscribe to the blog by using the RSS reader function at the bottom of the scroll-bar on the right.

Julius Young
http://www.boxerlaw.com/verdicts.html
*